Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0496

reference
179-tree-1
name
0496
tree-preservation-order

undefined

179-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.003240 50.852109)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.003183 50.852103,-1.003185 50.852114,-1.003193 50.852124,-1.003206 50.852132,-1.003221 50.852138,-1.003239 50.852139,-1.003256 50.852138,-1.003272 50.852133,-1.003285 50.852125,-1.003293 50.852115,-1.003296 50.852104,-1.003294 50.852093,-1.003286 50.852083,-1.003274 50.852075,-1.003258 50.852069,-1.003240 50.852068,-1.003223 50.852069,-1.003207 50.852074,-1.003194 50.852082,-1.003186 50.852092,-1.003183 50.852103)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL